Wanda Fails To Appreciate Your Many Names - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Wanda Fails To Appreciate Your Many Names

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Clerk on December 9, 2003 12:27:58 UTC

Rowanda does not realize that the half dozen guys I was posting to were the same pearson.

But the deal still stands. reapson has to treat me with enough respect to answer one question.

You answer one question, my very first one to you, and I will tell you who I am, but not where I am. Guys like you can be dangerous.

How about it. Can you answer one simple question. Wnat did you mean when you said the universe had only partial existence?

As far as I can tell you do not treat anyone with respect on this forum. I've read the last few pages of the archives. So I know who is real and who is fake. Anyone with a half dozen names is a fake.

Follow Ups:

To Wanda et al on "soul survial" - treewilly - December 9, 2003 - 15:22 UTC
- Re: "soul Survial" - wandaqueen - December 9, 2003 - 21:29 UTC
  - All I see is evidence for death - secretary - December 9, 2003 - 23:19 UTC
    - my 2 cents... - macula-1 - December 10, 2003 - 00:39 UTC
      - I did get carried away - secretary - December 10, 2003 - 03:13 UTC
        
        Re: carried away. I understand. But... - macula-1 - December 10, 2003 - 04:17 UTC
        
        Actually, that has been tried before - aurino__ - December 10, 2003 - 16:28 UTC
      - You've gone too far, Kyle - whomi - December 10, 2003 - 03:45 UTC
        
        Are you threatening me? - macula-1 - December 10, 2003 - 04:20 UTC
      - Far from it, fake "Doctor Nobody Brains full-of-fluff!" - carefuluniverse - December 10, 2003 - 04:52 UTC
        
        ~ - macula-1 - December 10, 2003 - 05:20 UTC
  - Terms of awareness - treewilly - December 10, 2003 - 22:20 UTC
    - So the answer from eastern religions is no. - wandaqueen - December 11, 2003 - 18:07 UTC
      - Yes it seems to be by definition - secretary - December 12, 2003 - 02:41 UTC
        
        Speaking of definitions... - quiet - December 12, 2003 - 05:50 UTC
        
        Why should I answer your question - secretary - December 12, 2003 - 12:32 UTC
        
        Why are you anonymous and harrassing this forum? - quiet - December 12, 2003 - 15:12 UTC
        
        You interrupt my conversations with other posters - secretary - December 12, 2003 - 16:22 UTC
        
        I'm Anonymous because you won't answer my question - secretary - December 12, 2003 - 16:30 UTC
      - Consciousness and electromagnetic brain activity - treewilly - December 14, 2003 - 03:34 UTC
        
        Re: Consciousness And Electromagnetic Brain Activity - tkorrovi - December 14, 2003 - 13:41 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins