He constantly maintains that folks who disagree with his 'idea' are mathematically illiterate and therefore can't understand his argument. Its hard to believe he has a PHD in physics. He doesn't even understand something as simple as how time can be modeled in a theoretical model [anyway the author chooses]. He thinks Einstein made a sophmore mistake the way he models time in relativity theory. The test for 'right or wrong' is 'whether or not' the theoretical model works. Maybe delusional isn't the right term? I picked delusional because, like all cranks, he chooses to ignore any evidence which would falsify his model.

• If I may make a suggestion - mlevine - July 31, 2003 - 20:16 UTC
  • Suggest all you want... - bruce - July 31, 2003 - 21:16 UTC
    • mlevine - yanniru - August 1, 2003 - 01:55 UTC
      • The one prediction he was kind enough... - bruce - August 1, 2003 - 03:15 UTC
        • Think of his theory as an approximation. - yanniru - August 1, 2003 - 12:46 UTC
          • He doesn't think its an ~. - bruce - August 1, 2003 - 19:51 UTC
  • Mike Levine -- the webmaster seems to be anti-Stafford - sillyuniverse - July 31, 2003 - 23:31 UTC
• the woodpecker calls the doctor a "button-pusher" - sillyuniverse - July 31, 2003 - 23:29 UTC
  • Stop breaking the forum rules with personal attacks - yanniru - August 1, 2003 - 01:58 UTC
    • That is not what I am doing. - sillyuniverse - August 1, 2003 - 02:14 UTC
      • You seem to be attacking yourself - yanniru - August 1, 2003 - 11:14 UTC
        • Richard Ruquist does not seem to deserve human rights - sillyuniverse - August 1, 2003 - 16:12 UTC
          • More slander from Mike Pearson - yanniru - August 1, 2003 - 16:43 UTC
            • I was just pointing out that the Golden Rule - quiet - August 1, 2003 - 16:50 UTC