Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
He Doesn't Think Its An ~.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bruce on August 1, 2003 19:51:33 UTC

Dick thinks it links QM and GR. He says so in the paper. What he gets is the Schwarzschild metric with an extra term [he says this no]. This means he doesn't link QM to GR. Did you read his prediction? He says Newton was right when he was predicting the outcome of the precession of Mercury's orbit. Newton predicts that all elliptical orbits do not naturally precess. Any precession is due to outside influences. GR predicts that all elliptical orbits precess naturally. In his arrogance he called me a liar.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins