|
|
|||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
Mlevine
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Richard Ruquist on August 1, 2003 01:55:52 UTC |
I can tell you what is wrong with Staffords theory- nothing. He assumes certain symmetries, uses the equivalent of sampling theory and derives some of the laws of physics, just like many others have done. His math is correct. Nothing wrong with the theory. All this has been discussed in great detail on this forum.
|
|
Additional Information |
---|
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |