Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Fool Is Too Strong A Characterization

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on May 23, 2003 15:34:51 UTC

He has every right to argue his point of view as logically and as strongly as possible. That is not being foolish. In fact, that is what has made him a leading exponent of the reductionist explanation of consciousness.

A least he recognizes that consciousness exists. It used to be that physicists would argue that consciousness is just a figment of our imaginations. Then quantum mechanics came along and made consciousness the creator of the world- if you did not see it did not happen. That is akin to the frying pan into the fire story.

So I think neurologists are well motivated to carry reductionist explanations of consciousness as far as possible. I just object to their attempts to cut off the funding of scientists that go further than they.

yanniru

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins