can model time anyway he wanted. You can model time anyway you want. The only thing a useful model requires is that it makes prediction that are experimentally verifiable. You make the mistake of concluding Einstein made an error when he chose to model time as something that can be measured using something called a clock. You should leave the nonsense out of your paper and just present your model. Somebody might actually read it.

• The nonsense is in your head! - doctordick - March 31, 2003 - 21:57 UTC
  • Think... - bruce - March 31, 2003 - 22:57 UTC
    • Current scientific thought is religion. - doctordick - April 1, 2003 - 03:44 UTC
      • You present yourself as... - bruce - April 1, 2003 - 08:40 UTC
        • I was kidding - carefuluniverse - April 1, 2003 - 17:52 UTC
        • prediction? - dolphin - April 3, 2003 - 00:29 UTC
          • I predict that you... - bruce - April 3, 2003 - 02:29 UTC
            • Bruce... - dolphin - April 6, 2003 - 00:12 UTC
          • Don't let your mind play tricks on you! - aurino_c_souza - April 3, 2003 - 16:32 UTC
            • umm.... - dolphin - April 6, 2003 - 00:21 UTC
            • Semantics are so fun - stormcrow - April 6, 2003 - 02:47 UTC
              • semanticaly speaking - sagefr0g - April 6, 2003 - 23:09 UTC
              • Semantics is more than fun - aurino_c_souza - April 7, 2003 - 13:38 UTC
                • every thing is feeback - sagefr0g - April 7, 2003 - 23:57 UTC
                  • You're right! - aurino_c_souza - April 8, 2003 - 13:30 UTC
                    • philosophical nonsense - sagefr0g - April 10, 2003 - 00:59 UTC
                      • Philosophy is good only if you can laugh about it - aurino_c_souza - April 10, 2003 - 13:39 UTC
                        • the point of "defining" in science is different - quiet - April 10, 2003 - 18:40 UTC
                        • a wealth of diverse views - sagefr0g - April 12, 2003 - 00:43 UTC
                • Another view - quiet - April 7, 2003 - 23:59 UTC