about what? About the purpose of theoretical models? You need to get a clue. Its not about what Richard Stafford thinks reality is. Its about models that work for doing physics. When you start with Einstein made a boo boo you generalize yourself as a crackpot. Its good that you don't worry about people not reading your stuff because that is what will continue to happen.

• Current scientific thought is religion. - doctordick - April 1, 2003 - 03:44 UTC
  • You present yourself as... - bruce - April 1, 2003 - 08:40 UTC
    • I was kidding - carefuluniverse - April 1, 2003 - 17:52 UTC
    • prediction? - dolphin - April 3, 2003 - 00:29 UTC
      • I predict that you... - bruce - April 3, 2003 - 02:29 UTC
        • Bruce... - dolphin - April 6, 2003 - 00:12 UTC
      • Don't let your mind play tricks on you! - aurino_c_souza - April 3, 2003 - 16:32 UTC
        • umm.... - dolphin - April 6, 2003 - 00:21 UTC
        • Semantics are so fun - stormcrow - April 6, 2003 - 02:47 UTC
          • semanticaly speaking - sagefr0g - April 6, 2003 - 23:09 UTC
          • Semantics is more than fun - aurino_c_souza - April 7, 2003 - 13:38 UTC
            • every thing is feeback - sagefr0g - April 7, 2003 - 23:57 UTC
              • You're right! - aurino_c_souza - April 8, 2003 - 13:30 UTC
                • philosophical nonsense - sagefr0g - April 10, 2003 - 00:59 UTC
                  • Philosophy is good only if you can laugh about it - aurino_c_souza - April 10, 2003 - 13:39 UTC
                    • the point of "defining" in science is different - quiet - April 10, 2003 - 18:40 UTC
                    • a wealth of diverse views - sagefr0g - April 12, 2003 - 00:43 UTC
            • Another view - quiet - April 7, 2003 - 23:59 UTC