Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
One Caveat

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on October 31, 2002 15:50:28 UTC


If there are any differences in our view, it is that I see atheism and agnosticism as completely ridiculous in what they ask of random beginnings. Like I said, trips to Vegas clearly demonstrate that whatever is the first principle(s) of the universe, it could not be a random set of first principles. If it were random, then trips to Vegas show how unsuccessful such attempts would be of self-replicating order such as 'all of this'. On the other hand, if the first principle(s) were some kind of holistic order (i.e., God), then the explanation is not only satisfactory, it is downright obvious. I just find atheism/agnosticism to be fully unreasonable. I'm surprised that intelligent people believe in such baloney.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins