God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Your Argument...
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Joe Antognini on October 1, 2002 01:37:28 UTC |
Seems flawed from the start. It seems as though if God created all living things they would be very unrelated. The very fact that all living things contain DNA or RNA points directly to evolution. The fact that most components of DNA between mice, chimps, and humans are similar also implies that they originated from one source (not God) and branched outward. Your car argument also seems to support evolution- the cars don't have the same designer, but rather, many designers that chose designs that have worked in the past. Sure, the designers can chose what additions to make, but that is why the evolution of cars is so much quicker than the evolution of life. Each time a cell enters mitosis, its DNA has a chance of changing. Each time a haploid cell enters meiosis, there is an even greater chance of a mutation. Every time two gametes merge, there is an incredibly great chance of a mutation. These mutations all build up to form evolution. I won't include a poorly worded insult insulting your intelligence here as I believe you can do that yourself. |
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |