Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Had Something More Like This In Mind

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on June 6, 2002 04:20:48 UTC


This philosophical paper talks about the 'supernaturalist creationist' position versus the 'natural creationist' position.

I especially liked this statement by Kemp:

"it would seem more consonant with God's wisdom and providence to think that He could and did create a world of secondary natures that could and did do His will. In other words, that He created a world which developed in the way in which he intended without His continually having make adjustments."

As far as application of the minimum principle (or principle of least action), I haven't seen much on this principle since Pierre-Louis Maupertuis co-invented it with Euler and Leibniz. He was a naturalist in the 18th century who even advocated a kind of natural selection prior to Darwin.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins