Hi Harv,

I hope you do not mind me bringing this to the top!

It seems the word "assumption" is at the root of our difficulties. I apologize to Yanniru! It seems I avoid making assumptions by subtle step of assuming everything and anything is possible! So I guess I do make a very specific and powerful assumption.

Dick: "Let Us Include All Possibilities!" Harv: "Let's Do"

Harv: "The problem is the other assumptions that you make which I have cited many times."

But I thought we were going to assume absolutely everything and anything is possible?

So I can not understand your complaint!

Does this clear anything up? -- Dick

PS. I will drop the issue but, really, it was not intended as name calling. Just think of me as someone who's thinking is strange. I apologize for the seeming insult.

• The problem is with the assumption itself - harvey1 - April 11, 2002 - 21:48 UTC
  • You are off the subject Harv! - doctordick - April 12, 2002 - 13:54 UTC
    • Deja vu - aurino - April 12, 2002 - 14:09 UTC
      • Harv makes it clear in my mind! - doctordick - April 12, 2002 - 14:55 UTC
      • Not avoiding the question - harvey1 - April 12, 2002 - 16:27 UTC
        • Four is enough - aurino - April 12, 2002 - 16:50 UTC
          • On the money Aurino! - doctordick - April 12, 2002 - 17:04 UTC
          • Case in point - harvey1 - April 12, 2002 - 17:40 UTC
            • Right on Harv - darwinpoodle - April 12, 2002 - 17:58 UTC
            • Have fun Harv! - doctordick - April 12, 2002 - 18:53 UTC
              • Research? - harvey1 - April 12, 2002 - 19:18 UTC
                • It's a Joke Harv! - doctordick - April 14, 2002 - 20:58 UTC
            • Whatever - aurino - April 12, 2002 - 19:04 UTC
              • Herein lies the problem - harvey1 - April 12, 2002 - 19:44 UTC
                • Analogy and question - darwinpoodle - April 12, 2002 - 20:33 UTC
                  • Splitting hairs - harvey1 - April 12, 2002 - 21:56 UTC
                    • Point taken - darwinpoodle - April 14, 2002 - 01:23 UTC
                  • About the ellipse in your question - pmartin - April 15, 2002 - 20:16 UTC
                    • Follow up - darwinpoodle - April 16, 2002 - 00:57 UTC
                      • Deja vu - pmartin - April 16, 2002 - 04:41 UTC
                        • A great help - darwinpoodle - April 16, 2002 - 12:31 UTC
                          • You're welcome - pmartin - April 16, 2002 - 15:02 UTC
                            • If I told you I would have to... - darwinpoodle - April 16, 2002 - 15:09 UTC
                              • Fair enough - pmartin - April 16, 2002 - 16:55 UTC
    • I don't think so - harvey1 - April 12, 2002 - 22:22 UTC
      • I disagree! - doctordick - April 15, 2002 - 04:24 UTC
        • I wish I could, but I can't - harvey1 - April 15, 2002 - 05:41 UTC
        • Neither 'yes' nor 'no', quite the opposite - aurino - April 15, 2002 - 14:09 UTC
          • Well, my answer is 'no' - definite, unequivocal 'no' - harvey1 - April 15, 2002 - 14:24 UTC
            • Sure it is - aurino - April 15, 2002 - 14:29 UTC
              • I think he has actually said "No"! - doctordick - April 15, 2002 - 17:52 UTC
                • Clarify - harvey1 - April 15, 2002 - 19:45 UTC
                • He always does - aurino - April 15, 2002 - 20:09 UTC
                  • I'm curious - harvey1 - April 15, 2002 - 20:18 UTC
          • And my point is...? - aurino - April 15, 2002 - 14:28 UTC