Hi Michael,

I think you have gotten ahead of yourself. Your question is meaningless until you define 'God', as Aurino and Mike Pearson have already pointed out.

I have begun to suspect that there are as many definitions of 'God' as there are people. At least, there are as many as there are people who have made any attempt at a definition.

So if you are interested in whether there is a proof of the existence of 'God' as you define it, then by all means, give us your definition, and some of may have an opinion about a proof.

Warm regards,

Paul

• can you see the Olpimics or Trainer from your Touse! - something - March 29, 2002 - 04:22 UTC
  • Neither, we don't own view property. (nt) - pmartin - March 29, 2002 - 19:49 UTC
    • Thank you. That was a very comprehending response. - carefuluniverse - March 30, 2002 - 04:27 UTC
• I don't think it is as necessary as a few of you think - harvey1 - March 29, 2002 - 05:11 UTC
  • It is a method...play dumb & have the 'prideful' explain to you - something - March 29, 2002 - 07:54 UTC
    • Does anyone hear that screeching noise? (nt) - harvey1 - March 29, 2002 - 13:15 UTC
      • No, but they're working on the road outside our home - carefuluniverse - March 29, 2002 - 18:55 UTC
  • Here's why - aurino - March 29, 2002 - 16:35 UTC
    • On a second thought - aurino - March 29, 2002 - 16:46 UTC
    • You have a point - harvey1 - March 29, 2002 - 17:07 UTC
      • A two-edged problem - aurino - March 29, 2002 - 17:39 UTC
        • When is it not personal, Aurino? - carefuluniverse - March 29, 2002 - 18:52 UTC
          • the link needs a dot -- I wrote it oops - carefuluniverse - March 29, 2002 - 18:53 UTC
          • You're trying to find a contradiction when there is none - harvey1 - March 29, 2002 - 19:05 UTC
            • Can't 'proceed' to be coherent if you won't do the work - something - March 30, 2002 - 01:52 UTC
              • Then why not go to AA and get sober? (nt) - harvey1 - March 30, 2002 - 14:36 UTC
                • I guess you skipped right to the last paragraph - spazcon - March 30, 2002 - 18:59 UTC
          • It's as personal as you want to make it - aurino - April 1, 2002 - 13:55 UTC
            • along with the will o the wisp and other phantasms? - spazcon - April 2, 2002 - 03:07 UTC
            • about that citation - spazcon - April 2, 2002 - 05:39 UTC
              • And your point is? (nt) - harvey1 - April 2, 2002 - 05:58 UTC
              • You are mistaken, Mike - aurino - April 2, 2002 - 15:05 UTC
                • you didn't show evidence for that, Aurino - spazcon - April 2, 2002 - 15:23 UTC
                  • A meaningless but stable number - spazcon - April 2, 2002 - 22:17 UTC
                • Thanks, Aurino - harvey1 - April 2, 2002 - 16:01 UTC
        • Well, we can add more - harvey1 - March 29, 2002 - 19:21 UTC
          • Meet TUM - a very nice guy - aurino - April 1, 2002 - 14:42 UTC
            • You're not wrong - harvey1 - April 1, 2002 - 15:18 UTC
              • The poet and the scientist - aurino - April 1, 2002 - 15:39 UTC
  • We disagree, Harv. I think it is absolutely necessary. - pmartin - March 29, 2002 - 20:36 UTC
    • Disagreement is good - harvey1 - March 29, 2002 - 21:33 UTC
      • You're right. - pmartin - March 30, 2002 - 00:19 UTC
        • I don't think it is a true or false issue (nt) - harvey1 - March 30, 2002 - 00:57 UTC
          • Me neither; I didn't mention either of those two words (nt) - pmartin - March 30, 2002 - 03:26 UTC