Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
A Problem Addressed By The Contemplative

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Residential on March 27, 2002 16:41:04 UTC

I'm not sure who doesn't know the following,
and my apologies for seeming to "lecture"
because I'm just blurting it out while I have
to be somewhere...

One problem of managing the human mind is
how to consider choose which problems truly are pertinent in a given situation, and how to address those problems objectively...in other words, address them independently of the influences of our personal programming.

These influences on personal programming include
* political experiences,
* previous statements we've made that we are still defending subtlely defending,
* subconscious memories from childhood experiences
* preferences learned or DNA-driven,
* or subtle pressures from other life forms.

How can one consider problems in a way where you KNOW you are applying NO personal skew at all? (and letting someone else direct you entirely does not do that, for that is a choice made for one of the above reasons).

If the system one uses is all inter-consistent and fully inter-supporting, such as the equations of physical science, then you have such an objective method. And perhaps the example of this might lead to more insight on a few of life's other issues. (Certainly, ignorance of physical science can contribute to having a skewed attitude both caused by and causing some problem solutions one proposes to be physically doomed to fail due to bad calculating.)

So that is one area where Dr. Dick's Long Essay
seems to be a problem solving guide -- how to approach some problems in a way you know is completely honest, and how to choose which problems to solve without .
The alternative is to choose problems, or even create problems, based on less than honest
criteria.


I did not understand Harv's reference to 6AM scenario, and a search on this sight did not turn it up.

Both Alan and Harv might enjoy knowing that
Dr. Dick is much gentler in conversation than some persons they have yet to meet. I can attest to this from personal experience. I hope you guys appreciate that Dr. Dick, gruff as he is,
is not doing you any harm.

Sincerely

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins