As long as math and universe are the mathematical consequence of anything else (of say, holy principle, or of strings, or of vacuum, etc) I do not mind to unify them.

• Then why do you object to a divine order? - harvey1 - January 19, 2002 - 20:38 UTC
  • You're both theists. n/t - luis_hamburgh - January 20, 2002 - 15:26 UTC
    • Theist accepts that God moves things without proof. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 21:38 UTC
      • Acknowledge Godel's Theorem, or remain a theist! - luis_hamburgh - January 21, 2002 - 17:39 UTC
        • Luis, looks like you are unaware og Goedel theorem. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:00 UTC
          • Penrose on Godel - yanniru - January 22, 2002 - 15:59 UTC
            • Where is it? - harvey1 - January 22, 2002 - 21:33 UTC
              • Penrose's interpretation - yanniru - January 23, 2002 - 15:34 UTC
                • The first paragraph of Godel's paper - yanniru - January 25, 2002 - 00:37 UTC
                  • Must be careful - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 02:12 UTC
                    • something different than being derived - yanniru - January 25, 2002 - 15:05 UTC
                      • Don't rely on me - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 16:24 UTC
          • Alex, how is you know Godel better than him? - luis_hamburgh - January 28, 2002 - 01:29 UTC
  • No, I do not object any principle. As long as it exists. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 20:56 UTC
    • Can't be - harvey1 - January 20, 2002 - 21:12 UTC
      • Interactions, interactions. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 21:22 UTC
        • But - harvey1 - January 20, 2002 - 21:28 UTC
          • I do not see any problem here. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 21:48 UTC
            • I'm talking about a much bigger role for a unification principle - harvey1 - January 20, 2002 - 22:05 UTC
              • I do not object-it is all math.No special arrangement for life - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 22:22 UTC
                • As for different fundamental constants - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 04:42 UTC
                  • Alex: Math universe depends on NON-equivalence - dolphin - January 21, 2002 - 07:34 UTC
                    • Alan, no god(s) nor their acts were observed. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 17:38 UTC
                      • "Explains" is a merry-go-round - dolphin - January 22, 2002 - 09:27 UTC
                        • Hey Alan - aurino - January 22, 2002 - 14:56 UTC
                          • Thank you, Aurino. But Google didn't find it! - dolphin - January 27, 2002 - 03:55 UTC
                  • No antropic principle needed. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:08 UTC
                    • So, is this how you construe science? - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 18:18 UTC
                      • Harvey, those "papers" are not even worth their paper. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:34 UTC
                    • Bulk - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 21:22 UTC
                      • s/b bunk (nt) - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 21:22 UTC
                      • I am just more open minded. - alexander - January 23, 2002 - 00:00 UTC
                    • Let's define open-mindedness - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:27 UTC
                      • Alex, let's define open-mindedness - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:30 UTC
                        • Oops, see the top where I reposted this. (nt) - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:32 UTC