I Do Not See Any Problem Here. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

I Do Not See Any Problem Here.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on January 20, 2002 21:48:11 UTC

Universe evolves mathematically, right? Right: Inflation-->Big Bang--> separation of forces--> separation of fermions from bosons --> drop of energy "per particle" (=cooling) due to expansion --> combining of slow moving particles into structures we call "nuclei" and "atoms" --> combining of very slow moving atoms into structures we happen to call "stars", "molecules", "planets", "galaxies","life systems", etc.

All without any "divine" influence, by the way - just mathematical evolution.

So, I see just a chain of mathematical results from previous mathematical results - nothing more. Especially when we dig deeper and deeper (or back to "more initial" conditions) - we discover that all is just a mathematical outcome of deeper (or earlier) conditions.

Follow Ups:

I'm talking about a much bigger role for a unification principle - harvey1 - January 20, 2002 - 22:05 UTC
- I do not object-it is all math.No special arrangement for life - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 22:22 UTC
  - As for different fundamental constants - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 04:42 UTC
    - Alex: Math universe depends on NON-equivalence - dolphin - January 21, 2002 - 07:34 UTC
      - Alan, no god(s) nor their acts were observed. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 17:38 UTC
        
        "Explains" is a merry-go-round - dolphin - January 22, 2002 - 09:27 UTC
        
        Hey Alan - aurino - January 22, 2002 - 14:56 UTC
        
        Thank you, Aurino. But Google didn't find it! - dolphin - January 27, 2002 - 03:55 UTC
    - No antropic principle needed. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:08 UTC
      - So, is this how you construe science? - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 18:18 UTC
        
        Harvey, those "papers" are not even worth their paper. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:34 UTC
      - Bulk - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 21:22 UTC
        
        s/b bunk (nt) - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 21:22 UTC
        
        I am just more open minded. - alexander - January 23, 2002 - 00:00 UTC
      - Let's define open-mindedness - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:27 UTC
        
        Alex, let's define open-mindedness - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:30 UTC
        
        Oops, see the top where I reposted this. (nt) - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:32 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins