Whether you call it principle or theory or natural phenomena, the FACT is that magnetic field, gamma rays, light, static discharge spark, thunder, Saint Elm lights, aurora, chemistry (including organic -life) are phenomena mathematically following from common root - electric charge. Thus what philosophers labeled "unification principle" physicists simply call "relating seemingly different phenomena due to their common mathematical origin"

• Well, then... - harvey1 - January 19, 2002 - 19:53 UTC
  • No, I do not oppose it. As long as both mathematically related. - alexander - January 19, 2002 - 20:04 UTC
    • Then why do you object to a divine order? - harvey1 - January 19, 2002 - 20:38 UTC
      • You're both theists. n/t - luis_hamburgh - January 20, 2002 - 15:26 UTC
        • Theist accepts that God moves things without proof. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 21:38 UTC
          • Acknowledge Godel's Theorem, or remain a theist! - luis_hamburgh - January 21, 2002 - 17:39 UTC
            • Luis, looks like you are unaware og Goedel theorem. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:00 UTC
              • Penrose on Godel - yanniru - January 22, 2002 - 15:59 UTC
                • Where is it? - harvey1 - January 22, 2002 - 21:33 UTC
                  • Penrose's interpretation - yanniru - January 23, 2002 - 15:34 UTC
                    • The first paragraph of Godel's paper - yanniru - January 25, 2002 - 00:37 UTC
                      • Must be careful - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 02:12 UTC
                        • something different than being derived - yanniru - January 25, 2002 - 15:05 UTC
                          • Don't rely on me - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 16:24 UTC
              • Alex, how is you know Godel better than him? - luis_hamburgh - January 28, 2002 - 01:29 UTC
      • No, I do not object any principle. As long as it exists. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 20:56 UTC
        • Can't be - harvey1 - January 20, 2002 - 21:12 UTC
          • Interactions, interactions. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 21:22 UTC
            • But - harvey1 - January 20, 2002 - 21:28 UTC
              • I do not see any problem here. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 21:48 UTC
                • I'm talking about a much bigger role for a unification principle - harvey1 - January 20, 2002 - 22:05 UTC
                  • I do not object-it is all math.No special arrangement for life - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 22:22 UTC
                    • As for different fundamental constants - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 04:42 UTC
                      • Alex: Math universe depends on NON-equivalence - dolphin - January 21, 2002 - 07:34 UTC
                        • Alan, no god(s) nor their acts were observed. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 17:38 UTC
                          • "Explains" is a merry-go-round - dolphin - January 22, 2002 - 09:27 UTC
                            • Hey Alan - aurino - January 22, 2002 - 14:56 UTC
                              • Thank you, Aurino. But Google didn't find it! - dolphin - January 27, 2002 - 03:55 UTC
                      • No antropic principle needed. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:08 UTC
                        • So, is this how you construe science? - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 18:18 UTC
                          • Harvey, those "papers" are not even worth their paper. - alexander - January 21, 2002 - 18:34 UTC
                        • Bulk - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 21:22 UTC
                          • s/b bunk (nt) - harvey1 - January 21, 2002 - 21:22 UTC
                          • I am just more open minded. - alexander - January 23, 2002 - 00:00 UTC
                        • Let's define open-mindedness - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:27 UTC
                          • Alex, let's define open-mindedness - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:30 UTC
                            • Oops, see the top where I reposted this. (nt) - harvey1 - January 23, 2002 - 00:32 UTC