Alex,

You've compromised much more to the theist than the theist has compromised to you. Theism already has a core belief of where God is in relation to the world and that hasn't changed much for large sections of believers for much longer than science has been around. I've already cited Heraclitus et al. who were saying these things 2100 years before modern science. Of course, it's obvious you had no idea what theists believed before modern science.

Warm regards, Harv

P.S., Hey, what happened to my 'warm regards' and smile?

• Anything to say on the subject? - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 22:14 UTC
  • I'm all for correct theist views of nature - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 22:22 UTC
    • So, what do you think of Zeus? - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 22:28 UTC
      • Pre-philosophical era (nt) - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 22:31 UTC
        • No, I mean, what do you think of eviction of Zeus from clouds? - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 23:00 UTC
          • Major misconceptions - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 23:23 UTC
            • Misconceptions or superstitions? - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 23:49 UTC
            • Science is stricter - luis_hamburgh - November 9, 2001 - 01:36 UTC
              • Right on!! - doctordick - November 9, 2001 - 02:41 UTC
                • To Dick, Paul, Aurino: a puzzle - dolphin - November 9, 2001 - 07:43 UTC
                  • Followers? - harvey1 - November 9, 2001 - 13:43 UTC
                  • I don't know that I exist. - pmartin - November 9, 2001 - 21:10 UTC
                    • Listen to Harv - luis_hamburgh - November 10, 2001 - 05:39 UTC
                      • I do -- every chance I get. (NT) - pmartin - November 11, 2001 - 04:46 UTC
                        • Strange Loops - dolphin - November 11, 2001 - 08:59 UTC
                          • This loop may be a/the boundary - jisbond - November 11, 2001 - 15:43 UTC
                          • Strange loops don't close up - pmartin - November 11, 2001 - 21:51 UTC
                            • Puzzles - dolphin - November 12, 2001 - 06:41 UTC
                              • Question for Paul, - dolphin - November 12, 2001 - 07:04 UTC
                                • computer use error - dolphin - November 12, 2001 - 07:10 UTC
                              • Question for Paul, - dolphin - November 12, 2001 - 07:07 UTC
                                • Whew!! - pmartin - November 12, 2001 - 19:31 UTC
                                  • Limits of Mathematics - dolphin - November 17, 2001 - 06:26 UTC
                • Back to the 60's? - harvey1 - November 9, 2001 - 13:52 UTC
                • Hello Dick - luis_hamburgh - November 10, 2001 - 06:06 UTC
                  • Re: inductive agnosticism - harvey1 - November 12, 2001 - 00:27 UTC
                    • Re: Belief - pmartin - November 12, 2001 - 02:43 UTC
                      • You choose to belive weather forecast - dolphin - November 12, 2001 - 07:19 UTC
                        • I don't think so. - pmartin - November 12, 2001 - 20:01 UTC
                      • I don't think this can hold true - harvey1 - November 12, 2001 - 18:55 UTC
                        • Why not? - pmartin - November 12, 2001 - 20:28 UTC
                      • Because (i.e., just because) - harvey1 - November 12, 2001 - 22:00 UTC
                        • I was right!! We are quibbling. - pmartin - November 13, 2001 - 00:35 UTC
                    • Better yet: How does my dog "escape" the need to believe? - luis_hamburgh - November 13, 2001 - 00:41 UTC
                  • I am profoundly ignorant! - doctordick - November 12, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
                    • Eight Miles High - luis_hamburgh - November 13, 2001 - 01:08 UTC
                      • Oops - luis_hamburgh - November 13, 2001 - 01:11 UTC
                      • A response (for what it's worth) objective or otherwise! - doctordick - November 13, 2001 - 02:32 UTC
                    • It's very silly; only a few here do post under their real names! - occupant - January 13, 2002 - 07:15 UTC
              • Some disagreements - harvey1 - November 9, 2001 - 03:06 UTC
                • Example of how philosophy shatters science - dolphin - November 9, 2001 - 07:51 UTC
              • some stuff about that - carefuluniverse - November 13, 2001 - 03:19 UTC
                • Absolute truth not in math either - yanniru - November 13, 2001 - 15:29 UTC
                  • All truth is relative, since definitions are required etc. - carefuluniverse - November 13, 2001 - 17:24 UTC
                    • corrected post - carefuluniverse - November 14, 2001 - 15:05 UTC
                      • Physics orientation - yanniru - November 15, 2001 - 14:45 UTC
                        • I don't agree with you at all about that - carefuluniverse - November 15, 2001 - 21:04 UTC
                          • All there is, is what/ WHO, there IS - dolphin - November 16, 2001 - 09:59 UTC
                            • obviously you have escaped being a journalist - carefuluniverse - November 17, 2001 - 05:18 UTC
                              • Good point - dolphin - November 17, 2001 - 06:10 UTC
                                • When do they reduce -- does relativity make time 'immaterial?' - carefuluniverse - November 17, 2001 - 21:50 UTC
                                  • Creator creates you WHO is - dolphin - November 20, 2001 - 07:50 UTC
                    • Bertrand Russell, Albert Einstein, and Harry Potter - carefuluniverse - November 21, 2001 - 20:32 UTC