Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Don't Think This Can Hold True

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on November 12, 2001 18:55:20 UTC


I agree that some beliefs are automatic and cannot be questioned because we are simply unaware of them. But, I think other - probably an extremely high number of beliefs - we are aware of (e.g., things around us exist), but we aren't willing to doubt. And still others we accept in some from of probablistic fashion as you suggested.

>>>By viewing belief as a probability spectrum like that, you have a pragmatic system that allows you to get through life in a reasonable way and still never have to claim that any belief at all approaches 100% probability of being absolutely true.>I think too many people, especially religious fundamentalists, view belief as a conviction of certainty. That's what causes all the problems.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins