Incorrect. "Being" Means A Life Form. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Incorrect. "Being" Means A Life Form.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on October 28, 2001 23:13:10 UTC

Of course, life may be common in universe. But is is chemistry (=quantum mechanics = math).

Follow Ups:

Being includes life form, but... - elegantuniverse - October 29, 2001 - 01:11 UTC
- mumbo jumbo - thom_cl - October 29, 2001 - 15:32 UTC
  - stop fooling yourself... - elegantuniverse - October 29, 2001 - 16:53 UTC
    - who's fooling who? - thom_cl - October 29, 2001 - 17:26 UTC
      - But we don't live in a vacuum... - elegantuniverse - October 29, 2001 - 17:47 UTC
      - There are holes in the antirealist perspective - harvey1 - October 29, 2001 - 17:56 UTC
        
        well thought response! (nm) - elegantuniverse - October 29, 2001 - 18:02 UTC
        
        There are holes in ANY perspective - thom_cl - October 29, 2001 - 18:44 UTC
        
        Then your point contradicts your position - harvey1 - October 29, 2001 - 18:56 UTC
        
        My position is a fact and cannot be contradicted - thom_cl - October 29, 2001 - 19:22 UTC
        
        Well who has final say here? - harvey1 - October 29, 2001 - 21:19 UTC
        
        Harvey, there is a difference: natural (=mathematically - alexander - October 29, 2001 - 21:45 UTC
        
        Please clarify - harvey1 - October 29, 2001 - 22:15 UTC
        
        Clarification (for Harv) - alexander - November 5, 2001 - 10:16 UTC
        
        If-thenism - harvey1 - November 5, 2001 - 21:30 UTC
        
        Ooooh I think I see it clearly now... - smartguy - November 6, 2001 - 16:22 UTC
        
        You got it! (nt) - harvey1 - November 6, 2001 - 16:46 UTC
        
        Determinism or manipulation of uncertainty? - elegantuniverse - October 29, 2001 - 22:21 UTC
        
        Any example of act of god? - alexander - November 5, 2001 - 10:19 UTC
  - What do you mean? - harvey1 - October 29, 2001 - 17:40 UTC
    - I mean "it's not out there" - thom_cl - October 29, 2001 - 19:08 UTC
      - God is an ontological belief - harvey1 - October 29, 2001 - 22:01 UTC
        
        Harv, what do you mean? - alexander - November 5, 2001 - 10:24 UTC
        
        Observation is appearances only - harvey1 - November 5, 2001 - 21:49 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins