- Looks like an improvement - harvey1 - October 13, 2004 - 05:14 UTC
- Question 1 - harvey1 - October 14, 2004 - 23:33 UTC
- Question 2: what is set B exactly? - harvey1 - October 16, 2004 - 20:18 UTC
- Question 3: how do you know set B is an unordered set of A? - harvey1 - October 19, 2004 - 17:57 UTC
- Question 4: is your model a physical model? - harvey1 - October 21, 2004 - 21:42 UTC
- Question 5: what is an explanation if physical is undefined? - harvey1 - October 24, 2004 - 15:23 UTC
- Set-Up for Question 6 - harvey1 - December 3, 2004 - 18:49 UTC
- Question 6: what's wrong with astral explanations? - harvey1 - December 3, 2004 - 20:36 UTC
- Question 7: how to decide what is known information? - harvey1 - December 4, 2004 - 04:30 UTC
- Question 8: an explanation must be consistent with experiences? - harvey1 - December 5, 2004 - 17:08 UTC
- Question 9: Is an 'undefined' explanation a real explanation? - harvey1 - December 7, 2004 - 02:54 UTC
- Question 10: what are the properties of a general explanation? - harvey1 - December 12, 2004 - 03:17 UTC
- Question 11: ls it really a model of a general explanation? - harvey1 - December 13, 2004 - 03:38 UTC
- Question 12: Is a lie to be considered an explanation by you? - harvey1 - December 16, 2004 - 03:45 UTC
- Question 13: does it matter to you if the explainer is lying? - harvey1 - December 17, 2004 - 04:39 UTC
- Question 14: does a method help you if the 'known' is a lie? - harvey1 - December 18, 2004 - 04:37 UTC
- Question 15: What if set B is disjoint from set A? - harvey1 - December 18, 2004 - 18:40 UTC
- Question 16: Is set 666 enough to foil any model of explanation? - harvey1 - December 19, 2004 - 05:45 UTC
- Question 17: can you resolve this discrepancy with set C? - harvey1 - December 27, 2004 - 05:34 UTC
|