Thats right science would revise the theories and models , do you fail to realise that if a large mass is sitting in the center of our galaxies then blackhole theories being eradicated would also mean a revise of our entire understanding and research, all theories would also mean gravity .

Let us please agree on some thing. You said,

what can of worms would this uncover if jets were proved to originate from a solid mass object bigger than a neutron star .

The empthasis being on solid. I have no problem with there being a large mass (millions of saolar masses) in the center of Galaxies. But I maintain
that this has to be a Black Hole. Else, it would be some large, light producing object. No such animal has been detected even though HST has recently surveyed the hearts of several galaxies.

• Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Polar jets of neutron stars (NS) and black holes (BH). - skintless - February 1, 2001 - 02:35 UTC
  • Re: Polar jets of neutron stars (NS) and black holes (BH). - mournblade - February 1, 2001 - 07:42 UTC
    • Re: Re: Polar jets of neutron stars (NS) and black holes (BH). - skintless - February 1, 2001 - 13:29 UTC
      • Nature of gravity. - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 22:49 UTC
        • Re: Nature of gravity. - skintless - February 2, 2001 - 13:11 UTC