Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
The Blackhole Of Reason

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on August 24, 2001 22:37:59 UTC

Mark,

Just in case anyone thinks our conversation is not about 'blackholes' I think our exchange has showed that it is.

>>>I'm not allowed to use logic to explain what it is for something to be logic. Can you at least see how that very act is necesary and yet at the same time is self-referencing?? Any valid argument must substantiate its claim with a logical backing.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins