Back to Home

Meade Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Meade Equipment Discussion | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Which To Buy...LX90 Or LX200?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics
Posted by Forrest Egan on March 5, 2002 00:36:07 UTC

Well, I figure I have a $3,000 budget...and I'm uncertain which scope to buy.

First, I should mention I'm currently using an Orion StarMax 127mm MCT on an EQ-3 mount. I've only been doing this since, I'm still a newbie.

I've decided that I really enjoy this hobby and I'm ready to make a serious investment. I just don't want to get aperture fever and buy a scope so large that I'll never use it. I figure that most nights I'll still use the 5" scope and pull the 'light bucket' out on clear nights when I can spend hours observing or taking pictures.

Well, along with another brand, the 'C' word, I've narrow my choice to two Meade product lines: LX90 or LX200.

With the 8" LX90 I can save some money and probably still have all the scope I'll need for years to come. It's larger aperture and GOTO will improve my observing sessions and it's still quite portable.

With the LX200 line, I can afford the 7" MCT, 8" SCT or 10" SCT. Obviously, the 8" being the least expensive gives me some cash left over for a wedge, dew prevention and any minor accessories I might need...the 7" MCT and 10" SCT will consume my entire budget.

Also, please keep in mind, I do have some minor back problems and feel that the 10" might be more scope than I'm prepared to heft by myself...and I don't have anyone close by to help me with this stuff on short, I'm leaning toward the 8" SCT.

Unless there's a pressing reason to get the LX90, it boils down to the difference between the 7" MCT and the 8" SCT as far as maintenance (collimation...something I've never had to do with my MCT) and contrast (I've heard the MCT optics give better visual results...and it's a slightly longer focal length).

Since I'm doing some astrophotography already, I'm figuring I should skip the LX90...the GPS will be perfect for finding faint DSOs and tracking things like the ISS. Also, I won't have to worry as much about alignment if I head to a new (darker) observing site. I'm not sure how much of this the LX90 can do as well as the LX200. I know they both have there a difference in their alignment/tracking capabilities?

Any advice appreciated. I don't want to throw my hard-earned money away on a scope I'll never use or one that doesn't live up to my expectations. I can save a lot of money by getting an 8" SCT on an EQ I'm taking this investment seriously.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins