Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Robert B. Winn on May 16, 2001 22:13:47 UTC

According to Special Relativity the satellite clocks would be slower. Since Special Relativity does not account for gravitation, there is no way for me to tell which clocks are slower because I have no idea what the effect of gravitation is on a clock. Scientists are payed trillions of dollars per year to experiment with these things. All I have is a cheap computer.
However, I have noticed that scientists do not like to talk about the distance contraction when you show them the following equation.

c=300,000 km/sec=x/t=x'/[t(c-v)/c]

= x'Lorentz / t'Lorentz

Robert B. Winn

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins