Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Robert B. Winn on May 18, 2001 06:56:01 UTC

Thank you for your kind explanation. It was very impressive. It is wonderful to see that the trillions of dollars spent on satellites were not entirely wasted.
My personal opinion is that your equations are not really an exact representation of reality, but are based on the idea of a distance contraction that does not exist, which gives you a close approximation, correct to several decimal places at the velocities involved in satellite orbits.
However, please do not consider this an attempt to minimize your considerable accomplishment of memorizing these equations. I just do not see how they could be the exact representation of time and space that I am looking for personally.
Robert B. Winn

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins