Bruce,
So tell me why the satellite clocks run faster by 38,000 nanoseconds per day. I can recall very clearly how scientists put a clock in a satellite and orbited it around the earth, and then told the world that it ran slower than an identical clock on earth, proving that there was a distance contraction, just like the theory of relativity showed. Why did that satellite clock run slower than a clock on earth, and the GPS clocks run faster?
Robert B. Winn

• Speed not distance - thunder005 - May 17, 2001 - 20:14 UTC
  • re:speed not distance - rbwinn - May 18, 2001 - 00:35 UTC
    • Space time... - thunder005 - May 18, 2001 - 04:55 UTC
      • Fritz - bruce - May 18, 2001 - 05:49 UTC
• Sure - bruce - May 18, 2001 - 04:48 UTC
  • satellite - rbwinn - May 18, 2001 - 06:56 UTC
    • As you've been told many times... - bruce - May 18, 2001 - 21:07 UTC
      • adieu - rbwinn - May 19, 2001 - 19:41 UTC
        • I would like you.. - bruce - May 19, 2001 - 20:45 UTC
          • velocity - rbwinn - May 20, 2001 - 04:36 UTC
            • The only thing you've proven.. - bruce - May 20, 2001 - 22:54 UTC
              • adieu again - rbwinn - May 21, 2001 - 23:16 UTC
                • You are a fool - bruce - May 21, 2001 - 23:35 UTC
                  • You are a name caller - rbwinn - May 22, 2001 - 13:10 UTC