Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
"Interpreting" What He Meant.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on February 10, 2001 19:13:38 UTC

This is a perfect example of how belivers try to make old myths look more realistic.

They say: do not take His words literally because literally they do not make much sence.

Instead - think how to ABERRATE (BIAS) WHAT HE SAID in such way that educated people will not laugh too much.

(Uneducated do not need to be worried about - they swallow most anything).

Why do belivers think that lie + lie = truth? Or is THIS what they call "THE TRUTH" ?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins