: Is it not implicit in his theory that every trait that is present in an organism has a biological precurser? YES (such a good point)

An atheist can only explain the first DNA with a possibility model of the first amino acid: A certain atmosphere (like carbon monoxide, methane, ammonia, and water vapor) Then the right catalyst (like a bolt of lightning)

But, the chances of something like that happening are impossible, and even if they did, where's the backup supply of amino acids to match up the would be template amino acid, AND how did it evolve into the complexity of life we have today (isn't that against the second law of thermodynamics)?

The problem with creation is that you have to submit to God (so people just say, "one's as impossible as the other" which is true for some, unfortunately)

• Hunter's Home

• Re: first things first - Barry_Backman/">Barry Backman - June 24, 1999 - 14:24 UTC
  • Re: first things first - Greg_Armel/">Greg Armel - June 25, 1999 - 05:19 UTC
    • See above...you are right. - Lee - July 1, 1999 - 01:35 UTC
  • Re: first things first well well well - yoner - June 26, 1999 - 05:23 UTC
    • Re: first things first well well well - Lee - July 1, 1999 - 01:24 UTC