Re: Re: Re: Dark Matter And Dark Energy - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Re: Re: Re: Dark Matter And Dark Energy

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Benjamin Nelson on February 9, 2001 15:12:35 UTC

Mike:

Christianity is much broader than the Bible itself. The gospel message is a bit of everything: Scripture, community, reality. And for readers of the Bible, the word of God is not just in the Bible; it is also in the community and in ones real-life station. Hence, the function of the Bible, read in a community context, is to help people to discover where God is calling them in the hubbub of real life. My point is that indeed the Christianity does evolve, and it does so continually.

B. L. Nelson

Follow Ups:

Christianity has to evolve. - alexander - February 9, 2001 - 18:44 UTC
- Re: Christianity has to evolve. - yanniru - February 9, 2001 - 18:58 UTC
  - Re: Re: Christianity has to evolve. - alexander - February 9, 2001 - 20:33 UTC
    - if you're interested - gwynj - February 10, 2001 - 19:07 UTC
      - Re: if you're interested - alexander - February 10, 2001 - 23:09 UTC
        
        Re: Re: if you're interested - gwynj - February 11, 2001 - 20:38 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: if you're interested - yanniru - February 17, 2001 - 20:54 UTC
        
        interesting post. - gwynj - February 17, 2001 - 22:38 UTC
        
        Re: interesting post. - yanniru - February 18, 2001 - 23:44 UTC
- Re: Christianity has to evolve. - blnelsonusa - February 9, 2001 - 19:14 UTC
  - Re: Re: Christianity has to evolve. - alexander - February 9, 2001 - 20:31 UTC
    - Objectively Dubious - blnelsonusa - February 9, 2001 - 21:03 UTC
      - Laws of Nature are Objectively Dubious for some? - alexander - February 9, 2001 - 21:39 UTC
        
        Re: Laws of Nature are Objectively Dubious for some? - blnelsonusa - February 9, 2001 - 23:10 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Laws of Nature are Objectively Dubious for some? - alexander - February 10, 2001 - 01:06 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Laws of Nature are Objectively Dubious for some? - yanniru - February 17, 2001 - 21:14 UTC
        
        why not tell HIM that? - gwynj - February 10, 2001 - 19:04 UTC
        
        When I get more stupid with age, I will. But it takes time. - alexander - February 10, 2001 - 23:06 UTC
        
        there you go, showing faith again - gwynj - February 11, 2001 - 20:34 UTC
        
        Yeah, but that's making a mountain out of a molehill - stormcrow - February 12, 2001 - 15:23 UTC
        
        i don't know - gwynj - February 12, 2001 - 15:35 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins