Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: I Was Wondering

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Benjamin Nelson on January 25, 2001 15:24:55 UTC


Scientists test theories by a method of corroboration, a roundabout, ongoing and gradual process by which confidence approaches the threshold of consensus, or fails to; in other words, scientists use the Scientific Method. About each theory, this method asks a series of questions, and the answers nourish belief, doubt or ambivalence. Yet, these questions are grounded in empirical, observable data, the carpeting of all "proven" theories that serve as the few scientific laws. But when a theory become monumental, it is an obstruction; it, as you observed, creates a sort of faith. Hence, the object of the game should be subject everything we know as "proven" to a bracing scrutiny, "no matter how well they seem to work."

B. L. Nelson

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins