Re: Gravity Doesn't Exist? - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Re: Gravity Doesn't Exist?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on January 24, 2001 21:31:18 UTC

Light is not what holds the universe together.

According to inflation theory, the Big Bang produced a critical mass of matter and anti-matter together. Then according to GUT theory 236 particle pairs all produced light. So the mass omega due to matter became 1/237, and the mass omega due to light became 236/237. So at least at that early time, light did hold the universe together according to big bang theory.

The vast majority of the universe, if you haven't noticed at night, is DARK!

I also find this statement interesting. Actually the universe is full of light in the form of electromagnetic waves which are invisible unless they go directly into your eye and collapse into a photon there. So darkness does not indicate a lack of light

Follow Ups:

Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - alexander - January 24, 2001 - 22:00 UTC
- Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - yanniru - January 24, 2001 - 23:09 UTC
  - Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - alexander - January 25, 2001 - 03:14 UTC
    - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - yanniru - January 25, 2001 - 13:38 UTC
      - Coherency and other. - alexander - January 25, 2001 - 17:04 UTC
        
        Re: Coherency and other. - yanniru - January 25, 2001 - 22:54 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Coherency and other. - alexander - January 26, 2001 - 01:07 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Coherency and other. - yanniru - January 26, 2001 - 12:59 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Coherency and other. - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 19:02 UTC
- Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 02:49 UTC
- It is kind of intresting that we seem to all agree that our eyes - philosofir - January 25, 2001 - 02:50 UTC
- It is kind of intresting that we seem to all agree that our eyes - philosofir - January 25, 2001 - 02:50 UTC
  - Re: It is kind of intresting that we seem to all agree that our eyes - alexander - January 25, 2001 - 21:41 UTC
    - Re: Re: It is kind of intresting that we seem to all agree that our eyes - philosofir - January 26, 2001 - 04:25 UTC
      - Nope, color variation is based on wave frequency. - richard - January 26, 2001 - 13:11 UTC
        
        Re: Nope, color variation is based on wave frequency. - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 18:49 UTC
Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 02:29 UTC
- Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - yanniru - January 25, 2001 - 13:26 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins