|
you say that time may just be caused by the relative motion of an object in comparison with the expansion of the universe , it does not answer the question as to how a primeval atomic beginning can just suddenly appear without existing in some time dimension .
When you were born you entered the man made dimension of time , prior to this you resided in a womb which resided in our man made dimension , this being true then shows the intuitive outcome that (there is nothing that exists today that has not got an outside area to its existence ).
Further more as I agree that at the speed of light time stops ,light then is the very reason why the universe is held in levitation , take away light and the universe would collapse to a given point or continue falling through an endless void , even science would agree to this as it is aware that if all the stars went out then the universe would collapse , why then does it contradict its belief in gravity yet continues to abide by its research built upon an ellusive force .
Yes I disbelieve in gravity , it is purely just falling , a mass blocking of light will cause a smaller mass to fall or orbit a larger mass , if the earth moved at the speed of light then everything would exist forever but as it does not then we have the answer as to why everything decays and why we percieve time to go by.
A clock upon every light wave would read time as standing still so I guess one need not bother trying to time travel because the simple reason being is that which ever direction you point your time machine or space ship then you would have to go beyond the speed of light , to bypass this speed means that you are beyond light itself , to go beyond light speed means that you would enter a dark void where there is no light , to reach this then you would have entered niether the past or the future , light has the speed it has for a reason , if it was faster then we would have been and gone , if it was slower the same would apply .
Time itself is not recognised by the universe , it is an eternal moment , we notice the passing of time due to our speed of motion , yet if you stood upon a galaxy looking at me and me looking at you then comparing eachothers watch could you distinquish which one is ( NOW ).
Hawkings once stated which came first the chicken or the egg , a statement that most of us are aware of , it implies that we do not know how the universe was created , however although the question is fair , then it is also not without an explanation , one can make a point to be taken into consideration , we know that the egg would remain there until it rots , we also know that if the hen continues to sit upon the egg then it would be transmitting its bodily heat which eventually would cause it to crack open with a chick , a burst of life , one then cannot dismiss that our earth is lit by the sun to create the continuous on going life cycle , a reflection of the hen sitting upon the egg and heating it .
Why then would one not consider that God is the light and the life and that he is an energy of no shape or form who bestowed his power upon his creation which caused him to rest on the seventh day after creating a sphere containing the entire mass of the universe , which then ignited and produced light .
Are we to believe that he created the primeval atom , would this have caused him to rest on the seventh day , science and the church once agreed to this big bang hypothesis , they both seem to lack faith if they still agree to this today , including einstein as he did at the time seem to believe in God yet aplauded the big bang concept with the priest G. lamaitre the original proposer.
Respectfully Yours , or if the arrogance continues then up yours to whom it may concern .
|
