Re: Re: Re: Re: That Wasn't The Question! - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Re: Re: Re: Re: That Wasn't The Question!

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by GwynJ on January 24, 2001 00:59:28 UTC

not to worry. before you can make an arrowhead of flint, you have to knock some rocks, keep at em with an antler or rawhide mallet (using metal will reconfigure the stone and make it shatter rather than knap). only after repeated attempts does one get a piece of workable size.

knock, knock, knock... :)

great swines think alike, eh? haha

Follow Ups:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: That wasn't the question! - skintless - January 24, 2001 - 01:07 UTC
- Nothing needs time to exist - richard - January 24, 2001 - 02:25 UTC
  - The main point is getting lost. - stormcrow - January 24, 2001 - 02:47 UTC
    - Crow, you are wise and venerable - richard - January 24, 2001 - 02:58 UTC
      - Thanks, I try :) - stormcrow - January 24, 2001 - 03:22 UTC
      - Re: Crow, you are wise and venerable - gwynj - January 25, 2001 - 00:40 UTC
    - Re: The main point is getting lost. - skintless - January 24, 2001 - 12:32 UTC
      - it was legit... - gwynj - January 25, 2001 - 00:37 UTC
        
        Re: it was legit... - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 05:02 UTC
        
        Re: Re: it was legit... - gwynj - January 27, 2001 - 01:22 UTC
      - You misunderstand me. - stormcrow - January 25, 2001 - 03:01 UTC
        
        Re: You misunderstand me. - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 04:45 UTC
        
        All right. - stormcrow - January 26, 2001 - 01:17 UTC
        
        I'll add to that. - richard - January 26, 2001 - 18:00 UTC
        
        you are wise - gwynj - January 27, 2001 - 00:50 UTC
        
        Good Luck! :) - stormcrow - January 28, 2001 - 07:34 UTC
        
        Re: Good Luck! :) - yanniru - January 28, 2001 - 15:26 UTC
        
        He sure does have a sense of humor - gwynj - January 29, 2001 - 02:23 UTC
        
        we wouldn't have 10+ posts if God'd been silent - gwynj - January 29, 2001 - 02:18 UTC
        
        Be back soon - stormcrow - January 30, 2001 - 03:53 UTC
        
        it's a free world - gwynj - January 31, 2001 - 00:21 UTC
        
        uhhhhhhhh, John? may i have a word? - gwynj - January 27, 2001 - 00:41 UTC
        
        Re: uhhhhhhhh, John? may i have a word? - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 23:29 UTC
        
        absolutely - gwynj - February 3, 2001 - 00:54 UTC
      - Re: No need of God after 10^-24 seconds. - alexander - January 25, 2001 - 21:50 UTC
        
        Alexander, well there is a reason why god rested that 7th day - richard - January 26, 2001 - 13:39 UTC
  - Re: Nothing needs time to exist - skintless - January 24, 2001 - 14:28 UTC
    - Re: Re: Nothing needs time to exist - yanniru - January 24, 2001 - 18:01 UTC
      - Re: Re: Re: Nothing needs time to exist - gwynj - January 25, 2001 - 00:33 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Nothing needs time to exist - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 04:04 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nothing needs time to exist - gwynj - January 27, 2001 - 00:28 UTC
      - Re: Re: Re: Nothing needs time to exist - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 04:02 UTC
    - Gravity doesn't exist? - richard - January 24, 2001 - 18:31 UTC
      - Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - yanniru - January 24, 2001 - 21:31 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - alexander - January 24, 2001 - 22:00 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - yanniru - January 24, 2001 - 23:09 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - alexander - January 25, 2001 - 03:14 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - yanniru - January 25, 2001 - 13:38 UTC
        
        Coherency and other. - alexander - January 25, 2001 - 17:04 UTC
        
        Re: Coherency and other. - yanniru - January 25, 2001 - 22:54 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Coherency and other. - alexander - January 26, 2001 - 01:07 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Coherency and other. - yanniru - January 26, 2001 - 12:59 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Coherency and other. - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 19:02 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 02:49 UTC
        
        It is kind of intresting that we seem to all agree that our eyes - philosofir - January 25, 2001 - 02:50 UTC
        
        It is kind of intresting that we seem to all agree that our eyes - philosofir - January 25, 2001 - 02:50 UTC
        
        Re: It is kind of intresting that we seem to all agree that our eyes - alexander - January 25, 2001 - 21:41 UTC
        
        Re: Re: It is kind of intresting that we seem to all agree that our eyes - philosofir - January 26, 2001 - 04:25 UTC
        
        Nope, color variation is based on wave frequency. - richard - January 26, 2001 - 13:11 UTC
        
        Re: Nope, color variation is based on wave frequency. - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 18:49 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 02:29 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - yanniru - January 25, 2001 - 13:26 UTC
      - Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 02:05 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - bladesinger - January 25, 2001 - 02:12 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 03:57 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - richard - January 25, 2001 - 15:57 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - alexander - January 25, 2001 - 20:29 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - bladesinger - January 30, 2001 - 02:24 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - alexander - February 1, 2001 - 17:49 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - bladesinger - February 2, 2001 - 03:21 UTC
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gravity doesn't exist? - alexander - February 2, 2001 - 22:02 UTC
        
        One more thing, I forgot. - bladesinger - January 25, 2001 - 02:14 UTC
        
        Re: One more thing, I forgot. - skintless - January 25, 2001 - 03:49 UTC
        
        Re: Re: One more thing, I forgot. - bladesinger - January 30, 2001 - 02:22 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins