Allright, I like the idea of life but where you use the term 'life' I'd replace it with 'energy', I just think the term is more fitting. Anyways. What bothers me is how people tend to refer to GOD as HIM. Eliminated Comptetition? That's a human trait/action that would imply a .. uhh.. rational... humanoid? or some such being. God isn't supposed to be any particular life form, right? God is just a name we put on something we want to have power over us so we don't feel so helpless or lost. You can see here that I have no preferable religion simply because of some small problems like that. GOD is still refered to as deity, a singularity is a nice term for it, but then all these traits are applied to it. 'God created the universe' sounds so much as if there was this all powerful ghost form and it just waved it's hand and poof, we have electrons in a big bang and what have you. Here's to the question you posted, who designed HIM? well? what made up energy? The beginnings of energy? the beginning of Bing Bang? s'what science is all 'bout right? where does it all come from? Anyone gets what I'm saying here?

Well, for one, if there has to be an all powerful GOD I don't think anyone designed him, and if he really exists, Gosh, I'd be kinda lonely living like that. I guess that's what he has angels for? That's a bit off track there.

• Re: Re: Re: Re: The singularity of god - wildernessvoice - November 8, 2000 - 07:58 UTC
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The singularity of god - mahasattva - November 11, 2000 - 11:11 UTC
  • Why didn't science think of that? - richard - November 11, 2000 - 18:43 UTC
    • Re: Why didn't science think of that? - wildernessvoice - November 13, 2000 - 06:22 UTC
• Re: Re: Re: Re: The god ..HOW BUDDHISM LOOKS INTO UNVERSE - mahasattva - November 8, 2000 - 11:54 UTC
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The god ..HOW BUDDHISM LOOKS INTO UNVERSE - wildernessvoice - November 8, 2000 - 17:13 UTC
    • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The god ..HOW BUDDHISM LOOKS INTO UNVERSE - mahasattva - November 9, 2000 - 08:09 UTC