Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Your Link

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Tarvo on October 29, 2003 22:57:16 UTC

Bohm first developed quantum field and pilot wave theory what supposed to explain everything, but later still considered that the implicate order is necessary. It's far from clear whether electron is complex or electron is a point and complexity is in the quantum field.

What I don't like are the "theories of consciousness" where is not explained why such systems supposed to achieve consciousness, and what are not implemented by any computer program. There also cannot be any theories of consciousness because consciousness is subjective, this is why there is artificial consciousness and why we must define the known objective abilities of consciousness to estimate whether some system can theoretically achieve these abilities.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins