Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Seems You Did Not Read My Link

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on October 30, 2003 00:14:02 UTC

So let me explain it to you. In my view, as well as many other physicists, consciousness is a charge, a new charge to physics, but one that has always existed. This charge acts the opposite of electric charge in that like charges attract and unlike charges repel.

So consciousness in this model is not subjective at all. It is completely objective. We just are unable to detect this charge because we are unable to detect dark matter. Yet we know that it is there. Read either of the links for more detail.

By the way, it follows that a sufficiently complex artificial computer can have consciousness on the same basis.

On this basis Bohm had it backwards. It's not the electron that has consciousness, but the pilot wave medium, which contains the implicate order if such a thing exists. This consciousness can guide electrons as well as detect them.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins