Lets Make It Simple - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Lets Make It Simple

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Duane Eddy on October 25, 2003 02:16:25 UTC

Perhaps the electron does go through both slots.
At least its field does.
Is it possible that the distortion of the electrons field causes the path of the electron to be distorted ?

If this were the case then each electron would have a distorted path independent of other electrons.

Follow Ups:

simple? - harvey1 - October 25, 2003 - 20:36 UTC
- Not true - duordi - October 25, 2003 - 21:56 UTC
  - What is not true? - harvey1 - October 25, 2003 - 21:59 UTC
    - this part - sagefr0g - October 25, 2003 - 22:17 UTC
      - But, this is not what I said - harvey1 - October 25, 2003 - 22:47 UTC
        
        the photo-electric effect - sagefr0g - October 26, 2003 - 01:05 UTC
        
        We can isolate the photons. - duordi - October 26, 2003 - 02:05 UTC
        
        Please clarify - harvey1 - October 26, 2003 - 03:42 UTC
        
        Is this better? - duordi - October 26, 2003 - 21:37 UTC
        
        Double slit experiments with single photons - harvey1 - October 26, 2003 - 23:27 UTC
        
        The experiment has been done - yanniru - October 27, 2003 - 12:23 UTC
        
        I found examples - harvey1 - October 27, 2003 - 15:27 UTC
        
        Can you give a reference? - duordi - October 28, 2003 - 04:34 UTC
        
        You know - harvey1 - October 28, 2003 - 15:17 UTC
        
        QED - bruce - October 26, 2003 - 03:08 UTC
        
        Field theory - harvey1 - October 26, 2003 - 04:38 UTC
        
        QED... - bruce - October 26, 2003 - 06:16 UTC
        
        Yikes! - harvey1 - October 26, 2003 - 12:00 UTC
        
        SR says you can't send information... - bruce - October 26, 2003 - 19:43 UTC
        
        Hmm... - harvey1 - October 26, 2003 - 23:09 UTC
        
        Its in the definition of information.. - bruce - October 27, 2003 - 00:15 UTC
        
        Still more problems - harvey1 - October 28, 2003 - 16:14 UTC
        
        Oops - harvey1 - October 28, 2003 - 16:16 UTC
        
        Instant messages... - bruce - October 28, 2003 - 17:59 UTC
        
        Section VIII - harvey1 - October 28, 2003 - 19:10 UTC
        
        I've already mentioned what was wrong with.. - bruce - October 28, 2003 - 20:25 UTC
        
        Maybe I didn't catch that... - harvey1 - October 28, 2003 - 20:57 UTC
        
        ...we are communicating vast distances - harvey1 - October 28, 2003 - 21:00 UTC
        
        It strikes me as a message... - bruce - October 28, 2003 - 23:23 UTC
        
        Well... - harvey1 - October 29, 2003 - 04:10 UTC
        
        The limit appears to be... - bruce - October 29, 2003 - 04:43 UTC
        
        I don't think we can - harvey1 - October 29, 2003 - 13:01 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins