God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Bruce
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by William Cao on June 21, 2003 21:31:52 UTC |
You are right about that. In fact, my theory should get the same results, such as light curvature and energy in free-float frame, as GR. My theory predicts that energy, such as light, can escape from the "Black Hole". It makes Black Hole lose it meaning as a result. I think that in the "Black Hole", gravity dominates. The URLs you give to me are very helpful. I think that my theory and GR can come up with similiar results other than "Black Hole" and I am thinking why it is the case now. |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |