Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by William Cao on June 22, 2003 00:45:15 UTC

Newton calls the nature of space-time tdal acceleration, but Einstein calls it spacetime curvature. Therefore, spacetime curvature and tidal accelerations must be precisely the same thing (see chapter2 page 7). The reason I choose to use r-coordinate was that I want to make people understand space-time-mass relation better in a simple manner. Remember that four dementional space-time has been taken into the consideration in my theory when I use radius r_rest. The issue for the GR is not space curvature, the issue is the assumption of inert mass. These assumption leads the theory not be able to consider space expansion factor and the mass decaying when the orbit reduced.
1.What do you think why the mass of "Black Hole" in the center of our milky way is so small if it swallows on Sun per week?
2.I still want to resolve my trouble with What is the best way to deal with these moderators?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins