math + consciousness = physics

(still typing a lot of stuff.)

I think I can vindicate Dr. Dick in many areas; I have translated a vast amount of physics into an astonishing ultra-clear and breathtaking form; but I think he has overlooked the consequences of being fully conscious of one's history (being transparent); and of seeing into the foundations of math (particularly noting the Zeno's arrow aspect of self-referential math-self-definition where numbers are assumed to be equally spaced; repeating cycles can generate skeleton-like shell definition structures).

(Example: force: freedom surface. strong force: cycles of division; strong by definition from repeat cycles (But doesn't have to be strong. Math assumptions about numbers being allegedly equally spaced generates a confining phase by repeat cycles here. Numbers act as skeleton-like defining shells. Many cycles of division strongly divide if you just count the cycles but actually need not divide. Weak force: cycles of multiplication. Many cycles of multiplication dilute (weaken), from a cycles- counting perspective yet need not dilute. Electro-magnetic: cycles of (relative) addition and subtraction. Many cycles of addition and subtraction repeatedly generalise and specify from a counting cycles perspective yet need not do so. (QED can be explained in terms of swapping of viewpoints between member-of-a-group perspective, and super-group-perspective.)

Gravity: cycles of cycles. Many cycles of cycles generates grouping and coming together in groups from a counting the cycles perspective yet need not do so. Quantum: meeting. Electro: generalisation. Magnetic: specification).

Voluntary counting: everything is different, to be is to be different. Consciousness counts: creation is the Body of God. Human race fell; why do we not die as infants on finding an "impossible" world? It was made possible it seems by Jesus Christ being in its history; we are caught in a safety net. Through Jesus Christ we can un-juggle confusion over reality and become transparent to Existence; is the Christian message I think.

Math: a number is defined as "history of a sum"
(any way counting can happen. Example: 84 is treated as "could be 487 + 5 - 408" and many other ways 84 can happen.)

Physics: an event is defined as "sum of history" (any way "happen" (the 4 of "compare and match two patterns, make new comparison") can count.

The patterns in physics all appear to fit the idea of a conference or discussion where every viewpoint gets to be heard; no one is left out; being and letting be (God is Love).

The patterns of atomic structure appear to map to the patterns of possible opinion exchanges; considering ideas; juggling and rejuggling thoughts; looking at every perspective and group perspective on the debate; etc. in a discussion.
Example: reappearance of previously juggled out pattern, juggled back in; is associated with "weak" force. Electron: modification of opinion. Charge: bias. Mass: uncertainty.

Also: anyone that imagines "unknown data" constructed those imagined patterns by juggling real data from their historical experience.

If you take something you "know" : that is built by your experience. Add something "imaginary" to it: that is also a potential juggle of your past experience.

But your "known" data and your "unknown data" both are sourced from your history; and if you are fully conscious of your personal history to conception: if you are transparent to Existence; then only logically consistent items get added or you would be destroying the integrity of the "known data" you are adding the allegedly "unknown data" to.

As you add, so you take away; as you judge, so you are judged.

As newborn babies it appears we had access to a transparently honest telepathic space where everything is known. To live in harmony with Existence is to be transparent to the Universe; the Universe knows you by name; your every move is like a new law of physics.

-dolphin

• Except I do not believe there is true reciprocity in complexity - quiet - May 11, 2003 - 07:16 UTC
• not so - harvey1 - May 11, 2003 - 17:09 UTC
  • algebra for philosophers - quiet - May 12, 2003 - 01:16 UTC
  • thank you - dolphin - May 13, 2003 - 02:55 UTC
    • If the universe is a Hologram, how does God fit in? - quiet - May 13, 2003 - 06:50 UTC
      • God creates - dolphin - May 14, 2003 - 09:46 UTC
        • And we sometimes inquire as to how God Creates - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 23:35 UTC
          • God's children - dolphin - May 17, 2003 - 08:12 UTC
            • No internet access - harvey1 - May 17, 2003 - 12:18 UTC
    • Let's talk - harvey1 - May 14, 2003 - 00:05 UTC
      • respectfully - dolphin - May 14, 2003 - 09:43 UTC
        • I would feel better - harvey1 - May 14, 2003 - 12:12 UTC
          • Leave him alone, Harv - aurino_s - May 14, 2003 - 14:04 UTC
            • What about alcoholism? - harvey1 - May 14, 2003 - 16:29 UTC
              • Well, that's exactly my point - aurino_s - May 14, 2003 - 17:04 UTC
                • Doctordick me? - harvey1 - May 14, 2003 - 18:11 UTC
                  • There are worse things - aurino_s - May 14, 2003 - 18:37 UTC
                    • Aurino is the guy who says he can read minds - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 23:12 UTC
                    • Aurino - dolphin - May 17, 2003 - 08:43 UTC
                      • What to pack - harvey1 - May 17, 2003 - 12:17 UTC
                • Aurino is just mad because his arguments were poor - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 23:10 UTC
              • response to Harv's initial reply - dolphin - May 15, 2003 - 06:55 UTC
                • You completely dismiss science - harvey1 - May 15, 2003 - 11:59 UTC
                  • Psychiatry is an art, not a science - carefuluniverse - May 15, 2003 - 19:23 UTC
                  • But Harv.... - dolphin - May 17, 2003 - 07:58 UTC
                    • Don't tell your opinions of psychiatry - harvey1 - May 17, 2003 - 12:15 UTC
                • You make some good points, Alan - aurino_s - May 15, 2003 - 13:51 UTC
                  • A.S. is unqualified to diagnose or judge anybody on this forum - carefuluniverse - May 15, 2003 - 19:25 UTC
                    • I can judge Mike's physics - yaniru - May 16, 2003 - 11:58 UTC
                  • About using correct category; Aurino - dolphin - May 17, 2003 - 08:24 UTC
            • Why arguing is useless - aurino_s - May 14, 2003 - 19:43 UTC
              • Good quote - harvey1 - May 14, 2003 - 20:11 UTC
                • Harv now says that he knows what "fits Alan to a tee." - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 23:26 UTC
                  • Mike... - harvey1 - May 15, 2003 - 00:42 UTC
                    • Let me understand...you read Alan's posts! - quiet - May 15, 2003 - 05:50 UTC
                      • Be more upfront Mike! - harvey1 - May 15, 2003 - 12:01 UTC
                        • Harv, you ask the wrong question - quiet - May 15, 2003 - 16:55 UTC
                          • Yes, but... - harvey1 - May 15, 2003 - 18:02 UTC
                            • Alan is not a problem on this site - carefuluniverse - May 15, 2003 - 18:54 UTC
                              • Yes and no - harvey1 - May 15, 2003 - 19:32 UTC
                                • What evidence do you have that "someone is hurting themselves"? - carefuluniverse - May 16, 2003 - 01:25 UTC
                                  • Read, Mike, read - harvey1 - May 16, 2003 - 11:57 UTC
              • Aurino's diagnosis would put the best scientists away - quiet - May 14, 2003 - 23:07 UTC
                • thank you for sympathy Mike - dolphin - May 15, 2003 - 07:00 UTC