are acts of intention. are they not?
i can not see that evolution would favor those intentions over the more noble intentions you allude to.

what i do find interesting about your post is your juxtaposition of the unbridled forces of nature (evolution, entropy, the very laws of physics) versus noble intentions and the opposite ignoble intentions. a good example would i believe be The U.S. Constitution with respect to noblity.

there you are getting into what i believe is the realm of the God/science forum we so feverently seek to play ball in.

regards tim

• They are simply pre-ethical, natural behaviors - carefuluniverse - May 3, 2003 - 20:11 UTC
  • most folks mean well.... - sagefr0g - May 3, 2003 - 21:41 UTC
    • please clarify - quiet - May 4, 2003 - 03:22 UTC
      • veiled delusions - sagefr0g - May 4, 2003 - 14:01 UTC
        • 'history is written by the survivors' summarizes your reply - quiet - May 4, 2003 - 18:12 UTC
  • Apology to the honorable non-humans - quiet - May 5, 2003 - 05:26 UTC
    • so what about the humans - sagefr0g - May 5, 2003 - 11:41 UTC
      • While Yanniru is still posting here I will not reply 2questions - quiet - May 6, 2003 - 06:28 UTC
        • i hope - sagefr0g - May 6, 2003 - 09:40 UTC
        • I am feeling successful - yaniru - May 6, 2003 - 11:52 UTC
          • As usual,, Yaniru did not even comprehend what I said - quiet - May 6, 2003 - 12:42 UTC
            • Mike has delusions of grandeur - yaniru - May 6, 2003 - 15:35 UTC