and I told him that Saddam was being stupid. I made a committment to a specific point of view. Robert Garfinkle thought it was so great that he sent copies of my statement to over 300 people according to him.

So what I wanted to accomplish with asking him the same question is to show how he never expresses his own opinion. He just tries to get others to make definite statements that he can then berate the statement and if possible the person.

And true to form, he refuesed to say where he stood on the war.

It's not that I care what he thinks. It's more that he has exposed the fact that either he does not think or that he is afraid to say what he thinks.

I see him trying to put me and others on the spot, so to speak, all the time. So it is about time that we do the same thing to him.

Thanks for your interest.

yanniru

• Here is what I think of your style of "scientific discourse" - quiet - March 20, 2003 - 23:20 UTC
  • Point one - yanniru - March 20, 2003 - 23:34 UTC
  • Point two - yanniru - March 20, 2003 - 23:49 UTC
    • Scientific Rigor = Zero; Informational integrity = trace - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 04:28 UTC
      • You are not qualified to make that judgement - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 13:08 UTC
        • You can't even spell judgment - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 17:11 UTC
          • Typical Mike response - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 18:24 UTC