No And Yes - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

No And Yes

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aaron Viviano on March 19, 2003 02:54:03 UTC

Holiness is being like God, so if you can define what God is scientifically then yes. Other wise no.

-Aaron Viviano

Follow Ups:

I should ask for your scientific definition of God - quiet - March 19, 2003 - 02:56 UTC
- Can I add... - robertgregory - March 19, 2003 - 05:11 UTC
  - Can you parse? - quiet - March 19, 2003 - 11:28 UTC
    - The greatest.... - robertgregory - March 19, 2003 - 15:45 UTC
      - so, you favor the triumph of the will - quiet - March 19, 2003 - 19:53 UTC
        
        Yes... - robertgregory - March 19, 2003 - 20:28 UTC
        
        Please quantify that 'moderation' - quiet - March 20, 2003 - 01:21 UTC
        
        The art of science - robertgregory - March 20, 2003 - 06:28 UTC
        
        your definition of God - quiet - March 20, 2003 - 17:32 UTC
        
        Mike... - robertgregory - March 20, 2003 - 18:49 UTC
        
        Robert... - quiet - March 20, 2003 - 20:17 UTC
        
        Mike is acting cowardly again - yanniru - March 20, 2003 - 23:53 UTC
        
        Robert... - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 04:31 UTC
        
        Enough! Again. - robertgregory - March 21, 2003 - 08:13 UTC
        
        I do not believe you have made a valid point - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 17:13 UTC
        
        Hmmm. - robertgregory - March 21, 2003 - 18:02 UTC
        
        Ask Mike what his scientific qualifications are - yanniru - March 22, 2003 - 02:36 UTC
        
        Your definition of God, Mike - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 00:14 UTC
        
        I posted the most about this topic by far - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 04:32 UTC
        
        You never posted a scientific definition of God - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 13:18 UTC
        
        You are a liar on this topic - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 17:15 UTC
        
        Here is one scientific definition of God - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 18:29 UTC
        
        It was really a poor one, not scientific, just jargon and b.s. - quiet - March 22, 2003 - 08:15 UTC
        
        Typical Mike - yanniru - March 20, 2003 - 23:56 UTC
    - One more thing... - robertgregory - March 19, 2003 - 15:46 UTC
      - Something between imagination and concrete knowledge - yanniru - March 19, 2003 - 19:28 UTC
- Can I Ask... - robertgregory - March 19, 2003 - 05:13 UTC
- Can I Compare / Contrast - robertgregory - March 19, 2003 - 05:17 UTC
  - My take - yanniru - March 19, 2003 - 12:59 UTC
    - This is what I was driving at. - robertgregory - March 19, 2003 - 22:14 UTC
      - Thanks - yanniru - March 20, 2003 - 04:57 UTC
        
        Yes, It could... - robertgregory - March 20, 2003 - 06:04 UTC
- More nothing from something - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 00:07 UTC
  - Does the webmaster clean up after you? - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 17:16 UTC
  - Good that you are quiet - yanniru - March 22, 2003 - 03:02 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins