I was really kidding about 'In moderation' I did not know how to react at the moment and was in another 'trying to be funny' mode.

To define holiness via science, well, I imagine we could, but would it not be like any other study and then definition?

I always thought, that each individual 'views' GOD differently, even people who reside within the same religion. The 'base' is identical, but in our minds, we view GOD a bit different.

So, knowing that, if we were to attempt to define GOD scientifically, would we do it using generalities, or would we do it using specifics?

• your definition of God - quiet - March 20, 2003 - 17:32 UTC
  • Mike... - robertgregory - March 20, 2003 - 18:49 UTC
    • Robert... - quiet - March 20, 2003 - 20:17 UTC
      • Mike is acting cowardly again - yanniru - March 20, 2003 - 23:53 UTC
      • Robert... - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 04:31 UTC
        • Enough! Again. - robertgregory - March 21, 2003 - 08:13 UTC
          • I do not believe you have made a valid point - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 17:13 UTC
            • Hmmm. - robertgregory - March 21, 2003 - 18:02 UTC
              • Ask Mike what his scientific qualifications are - yanniru - March 22, 2003 - 02:36 UTC
  • Your definition of God, Mike - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 00:14 UTC
    • I posted the most about this topic by far - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 04:32 UTC
      • You never posted a scientific definition of God - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 13:18 UTC
        • You are a liar on this topic - quiet - March 21, 2003 - 17:15 UTC
          • Here is one scientific definition of God - yanniru - March 21, 2003 - 18:29 UTC
            • It was really a poor one, not scientific, just jargon and b.s. - quiet - March 22, 2003 - 08:15 UTC