Re: Copernican Principle - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Re: Copernican Principle

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on November 9, 2002 04:50:46 UTC

***Actually, it's probably more a matter of reveling in the illusionary importance of humans. Ego, that's what it's all about. People just can't get over the fact that they're not the center of the universe. I can't really say that I understand it (of course, I guess I have more outlets for my ego than some), but I really hate it. People really need to look more into the Copernican Principle.***

I think what you are missing here is that humans are the 'center of the universe' when it comes to understanding the world around us. Everything about the world must be interpreted by us in order for us to survive and thrive in the world. If the Copernican principle aids in that regard, then I'm all for it as long as we don't have to give up more meaning than that principle is worth in that endeavor.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

instead, "consciousness" is the center of universe - carefuluniverse - November 9, 2002 - 20:27 UTC
- A post worth responding to.... - cosmotiger - November 10, 2002 - 05:21 UTC
  - My experience - harvey1 - November 10, 2002 - 06:14 UTC
    - Harv, you are not a real person anyway - carefuluniverse - November 10, 2002 - 18:04 UTC
  - Do you damn with me faint praise? - carefuluniverse - November 10, 2002 - 07:48 UTC
    - See, I told you so - harvey1 - November 10, 2002 - 14:48 UTC
      - The no-read rule works well - yaniru - November 10, 2002 - 15:42 UTC
        
        I am very impressed with Yanniru's admission - carefuluniverse - November 10, 2002 - 17:42 UTC
      - I already knew that - carefuluniverse - November 10, 2002 - 17:39 UTC
    - The truth is.... - cosmotiger - November 10, 2002 - 19:53 UTC
      - ...not Cosmotiger's paradigm - carefuluniverse - November 10, 2002 - 20:31 UTC
- 100 billion neurons - dolphin - November 19, 2002 - 01:16 UTC
  - Good to hear from you, anonymous Alan - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 04:52 UTC
That's not what it's about - cosmotiger - November 9, 2002 - 23:47 UTC
- There is some differences in our view - harvey1 - November 10, 2002 - 04:45 UTC
  - I agree - cosmotiger - November 10, 2002 - 05:10 UTC
    - In response - harvey1 - November 10, 2002 - 06:12 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins