"It's funny that you start name calling. I guess some Christian mindsets are only skin deep. Not surprising."

I wasn't name calling. I was saying that if I were, it would be a waste of time. I do not think you are a moron.

"You've convinced me it should be banned. People should read our discussion to see the damagine effects of home schooling. It is absolutely horrible."

Wow. It's amazing how that since I believe in the flood, which millions other believe too, including hundreds of scientist, it makes me completely brain-washed and indoctrinated.
And you attribute it to my home-schooling. Aaron is not home-schooled, and he believes as I. I would bet most of the ICR scientiest were not homeschooled, and they believe as I.

To continue on that point, why do you think that at least 74 scientists (ICR) write dozens of scientific articles about, write books about, present speaks about, and debate about Noah's ark (and other issues)? Why do they do this? Oh yeah, I forgot. Creationist are in it for political power, right?

"Besides, I like the way you ignored the giant lizards of the Paleozoic."

What did you want me to say about them? Yes, I believe they were on the ark too.

"You live in a fantasy world Sam. You don't fit a Brontosaurus in a 9 foot deck, even a 'baby' Brontosaurus. There are literally thousands of dinosaurs and reptiles and mammals that even as babies would not have fit on 3 levels of 15 feet high decks."

Actually a young Brontosaurus would easily fit in a 9 feet deck. They take 12-13 years to fully reach there maximum size, a height of about 20 feet.

"You did't count that list."

Yes I did, but I was factoring kind adaption in that calculation.

Sam, KC2GWX

• Scientists - stormcrow - October 16, 2002 - 14:51 UTC
  • Yes, yes,yes and yes. - kc2gwx - October 16, 2002 - 15:09 UTC
    • ICR is composed of highly qualified scientists. - richard - October 16, 2002 - 16:32 UTC
      • No astronomers - yanniru - October 16, 2002 - 16:39 UTC
        • Well, not professionally atleast - richard - October 16, 2002 - 16:54 UTC
          • That guy was a biologist - yanniru - October 17, 2002 - 12:00 UTC
• In the Most Obvious Fashion - harvey1 - October 16, 2002 - 15:44 UTC
  • To the extent that anyone cares what I think - quiet - October 16, 2002 - 18:58 UTC
    • I didn't say he was dumb - harvey1 - October 16, 2002 - 19:17 UTC
      • I didn't say he was Tweedle Dee - quiet - October 16, 2002 - 21:54 UTC
        • No, I think your name is Mike - harvey1 - October 16, 2002 - 21:59 UTC
          • That was appropo of nothing and a non sequitur - quiet - October 17, 2002 - 01:32 UTC
            • Ah, wise guy... - harvey1 - October 17, 2002 - 02:44 UTC
              • You can't deny it was appropo of nothing and a non sequitur - quiet - October 17, 2002 - 04:36 UTC
                • You are wound tighter than a spool of thread (nt) - harvey1 - October 17, 2002 - 12:39 UTC
        • Yes - fasteddy - October 17, 2002 - 02:54 UTC
      • A theory I presented... - emperor__alikar - October 16, 2002 - 23:19 UTC
        • You are being ridiculous Aaron - harvey1 - October 17, 2002 - 00:09 UTC
        • Well, you've proven one thing - stormcrow - October 17, 2002 - 01:09 UTC
          • It's all very hysterical when you stand back - harvey1 - October 17, 2002 - 02:47 UTC
            • The midway theory is consistent - yanniru - October 17, 2002 - 12:05 UTC
          • your reading it wrong... - emperor__alikar - October 18, 2002 - 02:13 UTC
            • What is a kind? - stormcrow - October 18, 2002 - 03:47 UTC
              • ubb code - phillipmartin - October 18, 2002 - 22:59 UTC
                • Not UBB, just HTML - stormcrow - October 18, 2002 - 23:10 UTC
                  • Shoot - stormcrow - October 18, 2002 - 23:12 UTC
            • Thanks for the open mind - yaniru - October 18, 2002 - 11:12 UTC
  • Aren't all of those dinosuars full grown? - emperor__alikar - October 16, 2002 - 23:12 UTC
  • I have to point out - fasteddy - October 17, 2002 - 02:50 UTC
  • Circles. - kc2gwx - October 17, 2002 - 03:19 UTC
    • No need to respond - harvey1 - October 17, 2002 - 12:42 UTC