Harv,

>>>"He's Definitely A Smart Guy . . . And not because he has an high IQ."

Well, the concept of "IQ" defines a collective, scientific attempt to create an impartial scale of human intelligence -- it's a standard. Of course you already know this, but you do realize you've arrived at your judgment of Langan by applying your own standards, don't you? Are you therefore saying that, while your own standards normally don't agree with the conventions of the standardized "IQ," this time they do? If this is the case, I'm curious which conventional IQ results you find to be so disagreeable.

-LH

• Congrats to Luis too! - dolphin - September 15, 2002 - 09:25 UTC
• Scientific? - harvey1 - September 15, 2002 - 15:10 UTC
  • You're talking about talent, not intelligence. (nt) - luis_hamburgh - September 15, 2002 - 20:27 UTC
    • Check this book out for latest research and debate - harvey1 - September 15, 2002 - 21:34 UTC
  • eye queue - aurino_s - September 16, 2002 - 19:08 UTC
    • Hints at racism - harvey1 - September 16, 2002 - 19:27 UTC
      • We had a debate on "IQ and Race" here at CWU; I videotaped it - quiet - September 16, 2002 - 19:39 UTC
        • My response - harvey1 - September 16, 2002 - 20:00 UTC
          • Ridiculous "science" - aurino_s - September 16, 2002 - 20:27 UTC
            • Mostly these are trolls - harvey1 - September 16, 2002 - 20:43 UTC
              • That is a new word to me - aurino_s - September 17, 2002 - 13:05 UTC
            • You could not disparage my remarks... - quiet - September 17, 2002 - 03:56 UTC
              • periodic, that is - quiet - September 17, 2002 - 04:16 UTC
          • That didn't sound very warm to me - quiet - September 17, 2002 - 03:54 UTC
            • How are you socially? - harvey1 - September 17, 2002 - 14:26 UTC
              • Hitler was the most popular man; Jesus was crucified - quiet - September 17, 2002 - 17:06 UTC
      • So, what do you think of that, Harv? - quiet - September 16, 2002 - 19:44 UTC