Hi Paul,
When I read this yesterday, I couldn't think of a reply.
"And, Mike, if you read this. C'mon, give the lady a chance and try to be polite at least until you get to know Genie. She is not anonymous."

I think you were giving me additional information
that Genie is a lady. But I don't think she depends on me for her chances. Nor was I taking any chances from her. Furthermore, she labelled me a troll and stomped away. Now, I don't think that was justified. And I have only your word that she is a she or that Genie is not anonymous.
Well, by definition, she or he might be anonymous to me and not to you if I know nothing more than a one syllable word purported to be a name. And since Genie said almost nothing after arriving and before leaving, I am now suspicious that you have been blind to the actual shape of the situation and cast a kind of innuendo toward me. Were you implying that I was giving Genie some kind of trouble? What was all that about?

Sincerely,
Mike

• I may have made a big mistake - pmartin - August 30, 2002 - 16:19 UTC
  • Several - carefuluniverse - August 30, 2002 - 16:40 UTC
    • Yes, but evidently not the one in question - pmartin - September 2, 2002 - 19:34 UTC
      • Gosh, you answered that as I woulda liked ta! - spazcon - September 2, 2002 - 21:29 UTC
      • Good-bye, Paul - genie - September 3, 2002 - 09:38 UTC
        • Where's the content, Aristotle? - kantolfir2 - September 3, 2002 - 18:05 UTC
      • Were they drunk on their own acronyms? - kantolfir2 - September 3, 2002 - 18:26 UTC
  • That's alright...that's alright...I made a few too - carefuluniverse - August 31, 2002 - 02:35 UTC