Paul, Your politeness in that note
begins to sound like the politeness of the
Blue Meanies in "Yellow Submarine."

You wrote:
" Gina took her cue as to the character of
the respondees on this forum from your response. You hit her squarely between the eyes with your
post. I can't blame her for deciding to walk away."

Paul, Folks talk to me on this forum worse than that. Half the folks are anonymous and they're the worst. In fact, I think your reference to the poster as "Gina" is more than I knew.
The fact that you say Genie is a lady is irrelevant. I didn't push or shove. She posted a link to the "We are so-o-o-o-o smart" website
with content that admonished us that there are ONLY these five possible conditions for the universe. Have you ever been told to get off your high horse? And in all subsequent posts, I made it clear she was welcome enough. Apparently you feel she has more priviles than I. She compared herself to Cher and said I would apparently exclude Cher. What nonsense! I would not, have not and never excluded Genie either, nor did I suggest "she" leave. "She" is in quotes because
we don't really have more than pixil alphabets to work with her.

This is all about one post apparently
Paul writes (of my post at http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/20878.shtml )

" (that) deserves the "troll" designation. With that kind of initial reception to this forum, I don't blame Genie for stomping away. I regret the loss"

"She" could read all the posts on the page and see what the forum's about unless she really wasn't interested in anything but being your partner in
politeness scam.

• Yes, but evidently not the one in question - pmartin - September 2, 2002 - 19:34 UTC
  • Gosh, you answered that as I woulda liked ta! - spazcon - September 2, 2002 - 21:29 UTC
  • Good-bye, Paul - genie - September 3, 2002 - 09:38 UTC
    • Where's the content, Aristotle? - kantolfir2 - September 3, 2002 - 18:05 UTC
  • Were they drunk on their own acronyms? - kantolfir2 - September 3, 2002 - 18:26 UTC