Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
My Breakthrough

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on August 16, 2002 14:02:53 UTC

on understanding DrDick is that he samples invalid data and then finds bounds or constraints on its existence. Now assuming that all data in the world is either valid or invalid, these are the constraints of valid data as well.

I finally came to this conclusion in a lengthy discussion with DrDick some weeks ago, but he never responded. Perhaps he just got tired of discussing it with. More likely he got tired of ridiculing me.

Anyway, that was my breakthrough in understanding the development of his theory. And if what I said in the first para above is correct, then his theory is correct- that is the development of his theory is correct. I always contended that his results are correct as other published theories come to the same conclusions.

However, this does not say anything about reality as I indicated in other posts today.


or as DrDick would have it,


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins